How humans may be losing Freedom of Speech, Time and Money on Some Social Media
Text on The Lamentation over the Dead Christ. Tempera on canvas |
Information and news is what humans base many of their
actions on. The worst possible human atrocities may be taking place in your
town not very far from where you live but if you do not hear of it at all then
nothing can be done. In authoritarian countries, flow of information and freedom
of speech is carefully controlled by the ruler. However modern democracies
pride themselves on freedom of speech. It is necessary in democracies so that
people may express their opinions to frame policies that influence their lives
as also make to the best possible choices in selecting representatives at time
of elections. However even in some of leading democracies media is not totally
free, it may have corporate owners who have their own interests to maintain and
grow their fortunes.
Against this backdrop, the internet has offered a valuable
place to seven billion humans on earth to share information and services like
google have made a great contribution to this. A prominent place where humans
share news and opinions is social media of which perhaps facebook and twitter
are the most popular ones at the present time.
However, the powers that wish to control and exploit
humanity have not given up. They too are ever devising new ways to conquer this
threat and some of these new ways are not honorable. One of them is stealth
banning. You can read about it on Wikipedia here.
Through stealth banning or shadow banning method, if you
post something on some social media, it will appear on your wall and timeline
but not on homepages of followers. Few will see it and you may as well shout in
the wilderness. The associated software may let a little slip through so that
you remain blissfully unawares for long, even years. In case the odd post of
yours is shared, the software would ensure that shared posts become similarly
invisible to other users.
Social media companies are private companies and they have a
full right to what is posted on web pages they host. However when this is done
through an open and transparent policy it may be fully legal and ethical even
though you may disagree with their policy. On the other hand, when it is done
through stealth it is unethical, deception and may even amount to illegal fraud
through which users waste their time and money because of the deception.
Recently in the US elections, during the primaries
to select their nominee, the Democratic Party used methods in favor of one of
the two candidates in the race. Many millions have objected to that. Some have
gone to court feeling cheated. The Party on the other hand says that they are
within their rights to choose any candidate they want by most any method. They
may be right. It is an internal party process and anyone can make a political
party with a different agenda or method if they like. However, what is wrong is
that they kept millions under the illusion that a fair contest was taking
place. Many donated money to the candidate of their choice and spent valuable
hours in his support (Bernie Sanders) while if the outcome had already been pre-decided
by the party they got fraudulently cheated out of their time and money.
The same sort of logic may apply to social media that
carries out stealth banning of users.
Comments